This article argues that soft balancing offers a useful framework to interpret the EU’s approach, as well as to reconcile its geopolitical narrative with its lack of hard security instruments, and its self-perception as a principled security actor.
Cristina de Esperanza Picardo
Recent PostsUnderstanding Investment Screening Mechanisms in the European Union | UACES Graduate Forum Committee - Summer Update | The Polish Rule of Law Breakdown Through Pink Glasses: Gender-based Consequences of the Polish Crisis | Populism and it's Definitional Dilemmas | Boris Johnson, Brexit and the Conservative Party: End of a Love Story? |
Related PostsPlaying Both Sides: on Hungary, Poland and the EU’s Response to the Invasion of Ukraine | A Neo-Schumpeterian Evolutionary Perspective on the Smart Specialisation Strategy of the European Union | Did the Conference on the Future of Europe go local? Evidence from Poland | Did the Conference on the Future of Europe go local? Evidence from Poland | The Maastricht Treaty and the End of Integration Through Law: Bits and Pieces of a Legal Ideology |
UACES, IACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors. The content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The map in the Ideas on Europe logo is an abstract map. It does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UACES, IACES and Ideas on Europe concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
© UACES 2023