This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Latest

A reflection about useful tools for researching the Europeanisation of cross-border cooperating universities

By Alina Felder

Education and research are at the fore of strategies to enhance competitiveness in the European Union. Higher education institutions thus appear as the nexus of the different knowledge related EU policies that aim at excellence in research, mobility in education or at cohesion through cross-border cooperation. In my research, I focus on the higher education institutions at this very nexus – the higher education institutions located in border regions. My objective is to determine the extent to which the ‘interplay between education and training and other policies of the EU’ is not only more visible than ever, but also has a tangible impact on higher education institutions and policies.

Europeanisation research has always argued that the EU influences domestic policy, while domestic actors shape the very structures the policies emanate from. Whereas previous research has consciously focused on the top-down direction of Europeanisation, Europeanisation researchers nowadays dedicate themselves to circular Europeanisation approaches. Since circular Europeanisation research is conceptually and methodologically difficult to conduct, I used the three tools of sequencing, comparison, and in-depth knowledge for researching the Europeanisation of cross-border cooperating universities.

Sequencing allows to not only consider actors as mediators of Europeanisation, but also to acknowledge them as active users of Europe. In this vein, EU policy is not only a constraint but also an instrument of empowerment for (sub)national actors. Applying sequential approach in my analysis, I first account for the effect of EU funding on (sub)national structures and subsequently the feedback of their implementation experiences towards the EU-level.

The (sub)national level of interest for my analysis, i.e. border regions, display a ‘privileged space to analyse how fluxes and exchanges of goods, peoples and capital have evolved in time and to what extent the process of integration is responsible for the increment of those transactions.’ Within these spaces, some variables or mechanisms of Europeanisation may be important, while they are not important in others so that a comparison is necessary.

While comparisons are at the core of Europeanisation research, the cases for comparison require careful selection. Since the objective of my research is to single out the effect of Europeanisation on the cross-border cooperation among higher education institutions, my ‘laboratories of European integration’ are thus cases of cross-border cooperation that made use of EU funding: the University of the Greater Region (UniGR) and the International University Lake Constance (IBH).

Higher education institutions that cooperate across the border and make use of EU funding instruments, i.e. Interreg, are not only expected to adapt towards the EU opportunity structure, but also attempt to alter it. In a first analysis I confirm these expectations and identify the two major factors guiding Europeanisation processes – rational decisions and socialisation. Higher education institutions cooperate with each other across borders not only due to strategic and rational decisions, but also due to an emerging cross-border identity that results from the joint experience.

When accounting for the concrete paths that the rationalist, as well as the ideational variant of Europeanisation takes in cross-border cooperation contexts, exchanging with the actors who are designing and implementing the EU’s knowledge policies is essential. To gain in-depth knowledge of ‘my laboratories’, I gathered primary data through semi-structured interviews with higher education institution representatives from the selected cases both at rector and administrative level, (sub)national political actors located in the respective region and in Brussels, and representatives from university interest organisations.

Overall, Europeanisation research does not only provide theoretical, but also methodological guidance for studying cross-border cooperation practices in Europe. The presented tools of sequencing, comparison and in-depth knowledge demonstrate that Europeanisation research when guided at establishing causality, requires detailed data and analysis, and thus time. While focusing on a small number of cases, my study provides insights into concrete Europeanisation processes. When clarifying the phenomenon in focus, the models of change and the theoretical challenges, Europeanization research does not necessarily run the risk of concept stretching. Instead, Europeanisation theory and methodology has helped me to reflect critically about ‘knowledge policies as transversal problem solvers’ and thus to unravel the overstretched responsibilities attached to higher education institutions.

 


 

Alina Felder is a doctoral fellow at the Bamberg Graduate School of Social Sciences (BAGSS). The central question of her dissertation is how EU regional policy instruments influence the cross-border cooperation among higher education institutions and their attempts to shape EU policies they (could) benefit from. Her research interests thus include Europeanization processes that are induced through network modes of governance the EU is establishing and encouraging public and private actors to participate in.

 

Comments Off on A reflection about useful tools for researching the Europeanisation of cross-border cooperating universities

Recent Articles

The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum: A Missed Opportunity to Strengthen Protection against Human Trafficking?

Published on by | 1 Comment

On 23rd September 2020, the EU published the ‘New Pact on Migration and Asylum’ that aims to be ‘[a] fresh start on migration in Europe’.  The Pact contains various commitments and timelines for action ranging from proposed reforms on existing asylum procedures rules to a proposed new Screening Regulation and a proposed Asylum and Migration […]

Stigma: Perspectives of Nigerian women trafficked into Europe

Published on by | 1 Comment

The fields of migration studies and human trafficking research (especially in Europe) are diverse and well-researched. Much work has been done among vulnerable populations such as refugees, unaccompanied minors, and victims of trafficking, including their experiences, push and pull factors, integration, etc. However, more work is needed to understand their experiences beyond the legal and policy aspects to consider their mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in the countries of settlement.

Cybersecurity and the EU: lessons from the COVID-19 crisis

Published on by | Comments Off on Cybersecurity and the EU: lessons from the COVID-19 crisis

The COVID-19 pandemic hit the world hard. While medical researchers are racing to find a vaccine, malicious actors are exploiting the new range of possibilities to interfere with IT devices. Cybersecurity has become a prominent feature of the pandemic, especially in the health sector.  

Operational overlap between the EU and NATO: An empirical venue for Member State decision-making analysis?

Published on by | Comments Off on Operational overlap between the EU and NATO: An empirical venue for Member State decision-making analysis?

The EU and NATO crisis response operations have been widely debated from a division of labour perspective. For some scholars, there has been a de facto partition of work between these operations, as NATO focuses on the higher intensity tasks of peace enforcement and peacekeeping while EU is mainly involved in the lower end of conflict prevention and post-conflict management.

Terrorism in the United Kingdom: Securitizing Narrative, Surveillance Practices and the Right to Privacy

Published on by | Comments Off on Terrorism in the United Kingdom: Securitizing Narrative, Surveillance Practices and the Right to Privacy

By Romana Oliveira Pinhal | In the United Kingdom terrorism is presented, by the British government, as one of the most serious and dangerous threats to national security and justified the introduction of legislative, political and operational measures aimed at combating the terrorist threat. The British securitizing narrative states the country is facing “a serious terrorist threat” […]

Poor Detention Conditions and the European Arrest Warrant: Are Social Rights the Way Forward?

Published on by | Comments Off on Poor Detention Conditions and the European Arrest Warrant: Are Social Rights the Way Forward?

With poor detention and prison conditions in EU Member states, Neža Šubic argues that social rights should be taken seriously in the context of the European Arrest Warrant. This would be the next step in designing an ever more rights-based Union. 

Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey: An Important Legal Development or a Step Too Far?

Published on by | Comments Off on Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey: An Important Legal Development or a Step Too Far?

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights recently delivered a judgment on a case concerning the murder of a Turkish Cypriot family. Nasia Hadjigeorgiou examines how this has broken new legal ground, while raising questions about the Court’s ability to address legal challenges in contexts of frozen conflict.

An Ever Growing Apart Union? On the Separating Impacts of Differentiated Integration

Published on by | Comments Off on An Ever Growing Apart Union? On the Separating Impacts of Differentiated Integration

The process of differentiated integration explicitly separates insiders and outsiders into different institutions. Within the Eurozone crisis, the institutional separation between ‘euro-ins’ and ‘euro-outs’ reached a new high. Alexander Schilin takes a social constructivist approach to reexamine the relationship between differentiated integration and interpersonal separation within the EU.

Ensuring the Future of Europe: The Decentring Approach to the EU’s Human Rights and Democracy Strategies

Published on by | Comments Off on Ensuring the Future of Europe: The Decentring Approach to the EU’s Human Rights and Democracy Strategies

Patrik Taufar argues that taking a decentring approach to the EU’s human rights policies may promote engagement and ensure the effectiveness of the policy. He frames this argument within the question of the future of Europe and what steps must be taken to ensure the existence of ‘a next European century’.

The Far-Right in International and European Law

Published on by | Comments Off on The Far-Right in International and European Law

Since the Second World War, the international community has sought to prevent the repetition of destructive far-right forces. Nevertheless, violent far-right entities have recently received unprecedented electoral support. In light of the current reality, a new book by UACES member Natalie Alkiviadou critically assesses the international and European tools available for States to regulate the […]

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.